Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 01:07
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Top prospects for 2025 Draft arrive in Buffalo for Scouting Combine - NHL.com
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Pure Orwell: Europe condemns Iran for attacks on its own territory - Responsible Statecraft
What’s next?
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Researchers Unlock An ‘Alien’ Phenomenon Under Earth’s Largest Lithium Reserves - The Daily Galaxy
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Do they have internet in hell? Most people on here seem like damned souls or demons.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What do you do you do if your motorcycle chain snaps while riding on the highway?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Why do people have polyamorous relationships?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.